Question

which statement would best conclude an evaluation of dan delucas argument in \dylans nobel prize settles debate: rock lyrics are poetry\?
deluca shows an impressive knowledge of the entire range of dylans creative output.
overall, delucas wide - ranging evidence will prove that rock lyrics are indeed poetry.
i find the examples of internal rhyme to be the most convincing evidence deluca offers.
deluca calls on novelists and a us president for their opinions of the nobel committees decision.

Explanation:

An evaluation conclusion should summarize the overall strength of the argument. The second option ("Overall, DeLuca's wide - ranging evidence will prove that rock lyrics are indeed poetry") does this by referring to the overall evidence and its purpose (proving rock lyrics are poetry). The first option just mentions knowledge of Dylan's output, the third is about a specific example (not overall), and the fourth is about a specific action (calling on others) rather than an overall evaluation.

Answer:

Overall, DeLuca's wide - ranging evidence will prove that rock lyrics are indeed poetry.