Question

what makes evidence \inadmissible\ in court? *
when it is circumstantial rather than direct
when the law of evidence does not allow it to be introduced at trial
when it was collected by a lab technician
when it is biological in nature

which of the following is an example of individual evidence? *
blood type
shoe size
dna
brand of clothing

Explanation:

• For the first question: Evidence is "inadmissible" in court when the law of evidence does not allow it to be introduced at trial. Circumstantial evidence can be admissible. Evidence collected by a lab technician can be admissible if properly handled. Biological - nature evidence can also be admissible.
• For the second question: DNA is an example of individual evidence as it can uniquely identify a person. Blood type, shoe size, and brand of clothing are class - level evidence as they can be shared by multiple people.

Answer:

• First question: When the law of evidence does not allow it to be introduced at trial.
• Second question: DNA.