Question

regarding the \movement\ requirement for kidnapping, which of these was decided in a court case described in your text?
o a. moving victims from outside to inside their home to be robbed did not meet this requirement.
o b. threatening to shoot a man unless his wife got money from a bank satisfied this requirement.
o c. moving a victim within a building to be assaulted and robbed did not satisfy this requirement.
o d. moving bank employees to the vault in order to rob it was deemed to meet this requirement.

Explanation:

Kidnapping requires a significant movement of the victim. Moving victims a short distance within a building (as in option c) is often not considered sufficient movement for kidnapping. In many legal interpretations, the movement must be more than slight or trivial. Moving victims from outside to inside (option a) or within a building (option c) for robbery - related actions (assault, robbery) where the movement is minimal does not meet the "movement" requirement for kidnapping. Option b involves a threat but no actual movement of the victim. Option d, moving bank employees to the vault (a more substantial movement for the purpose of robbery) would meet the movement requirement for kidnapping in some legal views.

Answer:

c. Moving a victim within a building to be assaulted and robbed did not satisfy this requirement.