intelligence or behav refers to african people, coloured
strand & see
net blankes
beach & sea
whites only
separate amenities were created for white people and black people. white people always got better facilities.
activity 1 find and interpret information about race from sources
(assessment aims and skills: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6)
1. look at the pictures source a. write a short paragraph which explains why classifying people according to physical appearance is based on the myth of race. your answer will be marked with the rubric on page 269.
2 a. study source a on page 174. explain why the un placed that poster in south africa.
b. comment on the implication that an institution like the un openly opposed apartheid.
3. when you fill in a form which asks you to state your race, what do you write? explain your answer.
4. have a class discussion about whether or not it is necessary to fill in your race on a form.
5. look at the bar graph in source b which shows how the population of south africa was divided up in 1948.
a. which group of people are in the majority?
b. what percentage of the population was classified as white people?
c. comment on the point the source is trying to make about the 1948 elections.
6. write a paragraph on how the apartheid government justified apartheid, using the text from pages 174 to 176.
science

Question

intelligence or behav refers to african people, coloured
strand & see
net blankes
beach & sea
whites only
separate amenities were created for white people and black people. white people always got better facilities.
activity 1 find and interpret information about race from sources
(assessment aims and skills: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6)
1. look at the pictures source a. write a short paragraph which explains why classifying people according to physical appearance is based on the myth of race. your answer will be marked with the rubric on page 269.
2  a. study source a on page 174. explain why the un placed that poster in south africa.
    b. comment on the implication that an institution like the un openly opposed apartheid.
3. when you fill in a form which asks you to state your race, what do you write? explain your answer.
4. have a class discussion about whether or not it is necessary to fill in your race on a form.
5. look at the bar graph in source b which shows how the population of south africa was divided up in 1948.
    a. which group of people are in the majority?
    b. what percentage of the population was classified as white people?
    c. comment on the point the source is trying to make about the 1948 elections.
6. write a paragraph on how the apartheid government justified apartheid, using the text from pages 174 to 176.
science

Accepted Answer

To solve these questions, we analyze each part:

### Question 1
# Brief Explanations:
Classifying by physical appearance (race) is a myth because race has no biological basis—human genetic variation is continuous, not grouped into distinct "races." Socially constructed, it's used to justify inequality (like apartheid's segregation, seen in Source A's "Whites Only" sign, where facilities were unequal despite no real racial biological differences).
# Answer:
Classifying people by physical appearance as "race" is a myth because race lacks a biological foundation. Human genetic diversity is continuous, not divided into distinct racial groups. Socially, "race" is a construct used to justify inequality, as seen in apartheid-era South Africa (e.g., Source A’s “Whites Only” sign, where white people received better facilities despite no inherent biological reason for such disparity). This segregation relied on the false idea that physical traits defined distinct, unequal groups, ignoring that human variation is not bounded by racial categories.

### Question 2a
# Brief Explanations:
The UN placed the poster (Source A) in South Africa to highlight apartheid’s racial segregation (e.g., “Whites Only” beaches) as a violation of human rights. Apartheid enforced racial separation with unequal amenities, so the UN aimed to expose this injustice and pressure South Africa to end discriminatory policies.
# Answer:
The UN placed the poster in South Africa to condemn apartheid’s racial segregation. Source A’s “Whites Only” sign illustrates how apartheid enforced unequal access to public amenities (e.g., beaches) based on race. The UN sought to expose this human rights violation, pressure South Africa to end discriminatory policies, and mobilize international opposition to apartheid’s systemic racial inequality.

### Question 2b
# Brief Explanations:
The UN’s opposition to apartheid signaled global rejection of racial discrimination. It legitimized the anti - apartheid movement, pressured South Africa diplomatically/economically, and upheld human rights principles, showing institutions can confront state - sponsored racism to advance equality.
# Answer:
The UN’s open opposition to apartheid had profound implications. It signaled global condemnation of state - sponsored racial discrimination, legitimizing the anti - apartheid movement. Diplomatically and economically, it pressured South Africa, while morally, it reaffirmed human rights principles, demonstrating that international institutions could hold states accountable for systemic racism and advocate for equality.

### Question 3
# Brief Explanations:
When asked for “race” on a form, responses vary. Some may write their self - identified or socially ascribed group (e.g., “Black,” “White,” “Mixed”) due to social conditioning. However, since race is a social construct, others might refuse, noting its lack of biological validity, or write “Human” to emphasize shared humanity over racial labels.
# Answer:
Responses to “race” on a form depend on perspective. Some write a self - identified/socially ascribed group (e.g., “Black,” “White”) due to societal racial frameworks. Others refuse, citing race’s lack of biological validity, or write “Human” to reject racial categorization, as race is a social construct, not a biological reality, and such labels perpetuate arbitrary divisions.

### Question 4
# Brief Explanations:
For a class discussion, arguments for filling “race” include tracking systemic inequality (e.g., for anti - discrimination policies) or cultural identity. Against: it reinforces racial constructs, ignores individual diversity, and can enable discrimination. The debate centers on whether the benefits (e.g., equity efforts) outweigh perpetuating a flawed social category.
# Answer:
In a class discussion, arguments for filling “race” on forms include: 1) Tracking systemic inequality (e.g., for anti - discrimination policies, ensuring equitable resource distribution). 2) Acknowledging cultural/historical identity tied to racial labels. Arguments against: 1) Race is a social construct, so labeling reinforces arbitrary divisions. 2) It ignores individual diversity (e.g., mixed heritage, non - binary racial identities). 3) Can enable discrimination if data is misused. The debate weighs whether the benefits (equity - focused data) outweigh perpetuating a flawed social category.

### Question 5a
# Brief Explanations:
In 1948 South Africa, the Black (African) population was the majority. Apartheid enforced minority (white) rule despite this demographic reality, highlighting the system’s undemocratic nature (ruling a minority over the majority).
# Answer:
In 1948 South Africa, the Black (African) population was in the majority. This underscored apartheid’s undemocratic foundation, as a white minority ruled over the Black majority.

### Question 5b
# Brief Explanations:
In 1948, white people made up around 20% of South Africa’s population (exact percentage from typical historical data: e.g., ~20% white, ~70% Black, ~10% mixed/Asian). This minority held political/economic power under apartheid, despite being outnumbered.
# Answer:
In 1948, approximately 20% of South Africa’s population was classified as white. This minority dominated political and economic life under apartheid, despite the Black majority.

### Question 5c
# Brief Explanations:
The 1948 population graph (Source B) shows a white minority ruling a Black majority. This highlights apartheid’s injustice: a small white group held power (via elections/legislation) over the larger Black population, emphasizing the system’s undemocratic, racially - biased nature (minority rule through racial exclusion).
# Answer:
The 1948 population graph (Source B) emphasizes that apartheid was a system of minority (white) rule over a Black majority. Despite white people being a small fraction of the population, they held political power (e.g., through 1948 elections), illustrating apartheid’s undemocratic, racially - exclusionary nature—ensuring white dominance over the numerically superior Black population.

### Question 6
# Brief Explanations:
The apartheid government justified apartheid with myths: 1) Racial “separateness” preserved cultural/ethnic identities (claiming different groups needed separate development). 2) Biological racism: false ideas of white “superiority” and Black “inferiority,” justifying white rule. 3) “Self - determination”: claiming separate homelands (Bantustans) let Black groups “govern” themselves, though these were under white control. These justifications ignored human equality and the reality of shared society.
# Answer:
The apartheid government justified apartheid through myths. It claimed “separate development” preserved cultural identities (e.g., arguing different racial groups needed distinct societies to thrive). It promoted biological racism, falsely asserting white “superiority” (in intelligence, civilization) and Black “inferiority,” justifying white rule. It also framed Bantustans (Black homelands) as “self - determination,” though these were economically/politically subordinate to white South Africa. These justifications ignored human equality, the reality of shared society, and the fact that race is a social construct—using false science and ideology to enforce white dominance.

Sovi.AI - AI Math Tutor

QUESTION IMAGE

Question

Explanation:

Question 1

Answer:

Question 2a