Question

1. how reliable/trustworthy/credible is this author in answering the essential question: did native americans influence the men who drafted the u.s. constitution? choose one 7. what tells you whether the information in this document is credible (reliable) or not? witness or expert: the creator is someone who can/cannot be trusted. for example, an eyewitness, creator or an academic expert. access to information: the creator had access to critical information that others did not. for example, a government official with insider knowledge or a journalist with direct access to a confidential source. high/low value: the type of source is particularly valuable or not so valuable. for example, a personal letter or an academic journal. perspective: the creator has a specific perspective on the topic. for example, a particular nationality or career. timeliness: the source was created at an important point in time regarding the event. for example, it was made on the same day. audience: the intended audience of the source is particularly important. for example, those who would have known key details. motive: the specific purpose of the source was to record specific information about the topic. reputation: the creator or source has a strong reputation for accuracy and reliability. for example, a well - respected newspaper or a trusted historian known for their rigorous research. transparency: the source clearly cites its evidence or methodology, making it possible to verify the information. for example, a research paper with detailed footnotes and references.

Explanation:

To determine the reliability of an author in answering an essential question, consider factors like whether the author is a witness or expert, has access to critical information, the value of the source type, the author's perspective, the timeliness of the source creation, the intended audience, the source's motive, the author's or source's reputation, and the transparency of the source in citing evidence.

Answer:

The reliability of the author depends on evaluating aspects such as witness - expert status, access to information, source value, perspective, timeliness, audience, motive, reputation, and transparency.