Question

the author believes the gene transfer process is a positive discovery, but she also wants to acknowledge that there are people who oppose it. which sentence from the passage best supports this statement? a \and of course, dogs are probably best known for their faithful companionship to individuals and families.\ b \the result was a delightful dog named tegan who is like any other beagle except that she appears to glow when placed under an ultraviolet light.\ c \though transferring fluorescent genes to a dog does not harm a dog in any way, there are some critics of the process.\ d \small creatures such as mice and rats can live happily in small cages, but dogs of course cannot.\ e \they see great potential in these developments and hope that the future of scientific research on genes is bright, not only for humans, but for their best friends, the dogs.\ 5 below are three claims that one could make based on the article \the glowing beagle.\ claims gene transfers are an important breakthrough that could greatly benefit humans. because of their similarity to humans, dogs are some of the best research subjects. genetic testing is too costly and controversial to hold much promise. draw an x by the claim that is supported by the most relevant and sufficient evidence from \the glowing beagle.\ then write down two sentences from the article that best provide evidence to support the claim selected in part a. first sentence: second sentence:

Explanation:

We need to find the sentence that shows the author thinks the gene - transfer process is positive but also acknowledges opposition. Option C mentions that though the gene - transfer (transferring fluorescent genes to a dog) doesn't harm the dog, there are critics of the process, which aligns with the requirement.

Answer:

C. "Though transferring fluorescent genes to a dog does not harm a dog in any way, there are some critics of the process."