QUESTION IMAGE
Question
16 mark for review
which choice most logically completes the text?
(answer: c)
a the observed behavior of fgd3 suggests that its strong association with chemotherapy responsiveness, despite its supporting role in the movement of cancer cells, make it a context - dependent protein that should not be suppressed as doing so may reduce the signals that cancer cells display to recruit immune responses.
b the observed behavior of fgd3 indicates that even though its role in aiding cancer cells makes it a threatening presence in certain contexts, its additional role as a transporter of immune cells in response to chemotherapy regimens that cause cell ruptures show its levels should be maintained rather than reduced.
c as the mechanisms involving drugs such as erso or doxorubicin are influenced by the impact of fgd3 and results in cell destruction that act as signals for the bodys immune response, the fgd3 cannot be considered a purely malignant presence regardless of its role in cancer cell transport.
d as the mechanisms involving drugs such as erso or doxorubicin cause proteins like fgd3 to swell and rupture inside cells, it is possible for certain proteins like fgd3 to possess a dual - role in the complex pathways involved in both cancer propagation and chemotherapy treatments.
To determine the best completion, we analyze the logical flow and content of each option:
- Option A: Has a subject - verb agreement error ("make" should be "makes" for the singular subject "its strong association..."). Also, the explanation about reducing signals for immune responses is less clearly connected to the overall context of FGD3's dual role compared to other options.
- Option B: The description of FGD3 as a "transporter of immune cells" is not supported by the original text's context about FGD3's role in cancer and chemotherapy responsiveness.
- Option C: It logically connects the impact of FGD3 on drug mechanisms (like ErSo or doxorubicin) that lead to cell destruction (which signals the immune response) with the idea that FGD3 isn't purely malignant despite its role in cancer cell transport. This fits well with the overall theme of FGD3 having a context - dependent or dual - nature.
- Option D: The description of proteins like FGD3 "swelling and rupturing inside cells" due to drugs is not in line with the original text's focus on FGD3's role in chemotherapy responsiveness and cancer cell movement. It also doesn't properly address the idea of FGD3 not being purely malignant.
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
C. as the mechanisms involving drugs such as ErSo or doxorubicin are influenced by the impact of FGD3 and results in cell destruction that act as signals for the body's immune response, the FGD3 cannot be considered a purely malignant presence regardless of its role in cancer cell transport.