Question

which of the following statements support the claim in freakonomics that people are generally good even without enforcement?
small offices are more honest than big ones.
unseasonably cold weather makes people cheat.
company morale is a major factor in honesty.
many people enjoy using the honor system.

Explanation:

The claim "people are generally good even without enforcement" implies that people have an inherent tendency to be good without external pressure. The statement "Many people enjoy using the honor system" supports this as the honor system relies on people's internal sense of right - wrong (goodness) without strict external enforcement. Small offices being more honest than big ones may be due to factors like social pressure in a smaller group (not just inherent goodness). Unseasonably cold weather making people cheat shows an external factor influencing behavior (opposite of the claim). Company morale being a major factor in honesty also points to an external (company - related) influence rather than inherent goodness.

Answer:

Many people enjoy using the honor system.