QUESTION IMAGE
Question
what criteria are you likely to use when evaluating someones argument? check any that apply.
□ whether the argument shows a lack of obvious bias
□ whether the author includes facts that support the argument
□ whether the arguments structure is easy to follow
□ whether the argument uses stories that make an emotional connection
□ whether the argument acknowledges opposing arguments
When evaluating an argument, several criteria are relevant. A lack of obvious bias ensures objectivity. Facts supporting the argument provide evidence. A structure that is easy to follow enhances comprehension. Acknowledging opposing arguments shows fairness. Using stories for emotional connection can engage the audience.
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
All of the listed criteria (whether the argument shows a lack of obvious bias, whether the author includes facts that support the argument, whether the argument's structure is easy to follow, whether the argument uses stories that make an emotional connection, whether the argument acknowledges opposing arguments) are likely to be used when evaluating someone's argument.