Question

in paragraph 7, how does the author contradict the myth that hypnosis can be used to force people to act in a way that is out of character?
a by comparing stage hypnotists to criminal investigators
b by showing that hypnosis cannot change a persons core values
c by stating that hypnosis is often misunderstood in academic settings
d by describing how hypnotherapy uses gentle imagery and suggestion
part b
how effective is the authors argument that hypnosis cannot make people behave in uncharacteristic ways?
a it is very effective, because the author combines clear explanations with a specific, familiar example that demonstrates the point.
b it is somewhat effective, because the author explains how hypnosis works but fails to directly refute opposing views.
c it is mostly ineffective, because the author relies too much on emotional appeals and anecdotal experience.
d it is ineffective, because the author makes claims without citing scientific evidence or expert opinion.

Explanation:

For Part A: Hypnosis not changing core values directly contradicts the myth of forcing uncharacteristic acts.
For Part B: Combining clear explanations with a familiar example (like in hypnotherapy context) makes the argument very effective.

Answer:

Part A: B. by showing that hypnosis cannot change a person's core values
Part B: A. It is very effective, because the author combines clear explanations with a specific, familiar example that demonstrates the point.