Question

for others, their experiences limit their ability to understand the experiences of others. others simply do not care. hence, one must accept the proposition that a difference there will be by the presence of women and people of color on the bench. personal experiences affect the facts that judges choose to see. my hope is that i will take the good from my experiences and extrapolate them further into areas with which i am unfamiliar. i simply do not know exactly what that difference will be in my judging. but i accept there will be some based on my gender and my latina heritage. - \a latina judges voice,\ sonia sotomayor how does the author use pathos to support her purpose? the author appeals to the audiences values by saying, \personal experiences affect the facts.\ the author appeals to the audiences values by saying, \others simply do not care.\ the author appeals to the audiences emotions by saying, \that difference will be in my judging.\ the author appeals to the audiences emotions by saying, \my latina heritage.\

Explanation:

Pathos is an appeal to the audience's emotions. The author uses the statement "That difference will be in my judging" which evokes an emotional response related to the impact of personal background (gender and Latina heritage) on judgment. This is an emotional appeal as it makes the audience consider the emotional weight of how personal identity influences a significant role (judging).

Answer:

The author appeals to the audience's emotions by saying, "That difference will be in my judging."