Question

how is the information about the government rules in \keeping a language alive\ different from \language warriors\? add the difference to the chart.
\language warriors\: in the past, the united states government created many policies that were damaging to native cultures.
\keeping a language alive\: my mother and grandmother didnt speak the language. back then, the government forced native children to go to boarding schools.
\keeping a language alive\ explains when vukelich learned about the government rules.
\keeping a language alive\ shows how vukelichs family was harmed by the government rules.
\keeping a language alive\ tells why vukelich was forced to follow the government rules.

Explanation:

"Language Warriors" gives a general statement about government - created policies damaging Native cultures. "Keeping a Language Alive" provides a personal - family related example of the harm caused by government - forced boarding school policies to Native people, specifically how it affected the speaker's mother and grandmother not speaking the language.

Answer:

"Keeping a Language Alive" shows how the government rules harmed the author's family, while "Language Warriors" only mentions government - created policies damaging Native cultures in general terms.