Question

danielle is getting ready to write an essay about the 1995 film version of romeo + juliet. she wants to make the claim that the film is more successful at connecting the audience to the characters emotions, so she sits down to read the play for the first time. what advice do you have for danielle? danielle, this is going to be a great paper. remember to research what critics said when the movie first came out so you have expert opinions to back up your claim. danielle, you should definitely read the play before you make any claim about how it compares to the film. you need to consider your evidence before making a claim. danielle, you should know that the book is always better than the movie. you need to consider the complexity of written text versus the simplicity of the screen. danielle, you are right on. its important to know what you are going to argue before you get lost in the evidence.

Explanation:

When comparing a play and its film adaptation, it's crucial to have a solid understanding of both. Reading the play first allows Danielle to analyze the original text's nuances, themes, and character developments. This provides a foundation for comparing how the film interprets and presents these elements. Considering evidence (by reading the play) before making a claim ensures the argument is well - supported.
Researching critics' opinions (first option) can be part of the process but is secondary to understanding the primary source (the play). The statement "the book is always better than the movie" (third option) is a subjective generalization and not a helpful, evidence - based approach. While having a clear argument is important (fourth option), without first understanding the play (the evidence), the argument may lack depth and accuracy.

Answer:

Danielle, you should definitely read the play before you make any claim about how it compares to the film. You need to consider your evidence before making a claim.