Question

compare the details that were included in both texts.

people with aphantasia often memorize details differently.

until 2015, aphantasia was an unnamed condition.

zeman researched the rare inability to imagine things visually.

aphantasiacs reached out to zeman after learning they were not the only ones with this condition.

who would likely agree that people are usually able to picture things in their mind?

the author of text 1

the author of text 2

both authors

Explanation:

Since the problem is about comparing details in two texts and determining which authors would agree on a statement, it falls under the Arts discipline (specifically Linguistics as it involves text analysis). Both texts discuss aphantasia, which is a condition related to visual imagination. The key is that aphantasia is presented as a deviation from the norm. If aphantasia is the inability to picture things (as implied by the details like "rare inability to imagine things visually"), then the norm (what people usually can do) is being able to picture things. Since both texts are about aphantasia (a deviation from the normal ability to visualize), both authors would likely agree that people are usually able to picture things (as aphantasia is presented as an exception).

Answer:

both authors