QUESTION IMAGE
Question
n l mₗ mₛ
2 x 0 +1/2
n l mₗ mₛ
2 y? 0 +1/2
if the above quantum numbers describe two different electrons in an oxygen atom, and the angular momentum number x is 1, what is the possible number of y?
enter the answer
Step1: Recall quantum number rules
For a given principal quantum number \( n \), the angular momentum quantum number \( l \) can take values from \( 0 \) to \( n - 1 \). Here, \( n = 2 \), so possible \( l \) values are \( 0 \) and \( 1 \). Also, electrons in the same atom must have unique sets of quantum numbers (Pauli exclusion principle), but here \( m_l = 0 \) and \( m_s = +\frac{1}{2} \) for both, but \( l \) can be different as long as it's within the valid range for \( n = 2 \). Since \( X = 1 \), \( Y \) can be the other valid \( l \) value for \( n = 2 \), which is \( 0 \), or it can also be \( 1 \) (but wait, no—wait, the Pauli exclusion principle: the four quantum numbers must be unique. Wait, the two electrons have \( n = 2 \), \( m_l = 0 \), \( m_s = +\frac{1}{2} \). So if \( X = 1 \), then for the second electron, \( l \) (Y) can be \( 0 \) (since \( l = 1 \) and \( l = 0 \) are different, and the other quantum numbers: \( m_l = 0 \), \( m_s = +\frac{1}{2} \). Wait, no—wait, the Pauli exclusion principle states that no two electrons in an atom can have the same four quantum numbers. So the first electron has \( n = 2 \), \( l = 1 \), \( m_l = 0 \), \( m_s = +\frac{1}{2} \). The second electron has \( n = 2 \), \( m_l = 0 \), \( m_s = +\frac{1}{2} \). So to have a different set, \( l \) (Y) must be different from \( X = 1 \)? Wait, no—wait, \( l \) can be \( 0 \) or \( 1 \) for \( n = 2 \). Wait, but if \( l = 1 \), then the four quantum numbers would be \( n = 2 \), \( l = 1 \), \( m_l = 0 \), \( m_s = +\frac{1}{2} \), which is the same as the first electron, which is not allowed. So \( Y \) must be \( 0 \), because \( l = 0 \) is a valid value for \( n = 2 \), and then the quantum numbers would be \( n = 2 \), \( l = 0 \), \( m_l = 0 \), \( m_s = +\frac{1}{2} \), which is different from the first electron's quantum numbers (\( n = 2 \), \( l = 1 \), \( m_l = 0 \), \( m_s = +\frac{1}{2} \)). Wait, but also, can \( Y \) be \( 1 \)? No, because then the four quantum numbers would be identical (same \( n \), \( l \), \( m_l \), \( m_s \)), which violates Pauli exclusion. So the only possible value for \( Y \) is \( 0 \)? Wait, no—wait, \( l \) for \( n = 2 \) can be \( 0 \) (s - orbital) or \( 1 \) (p - orbital). The first electron is in \( l = 1 \) (p - orbital), \( m_l = 0 \), spin up. The second electron has \( m_l = 0 \), spin up, so to have a different set, \( l \) must be different. So \( l = 0 \) (s - orbital) is allowed, because then \( n = 2 \), \( l = 0 \), \( m_l = 0 \), \( m_s = +\frac{1}{2} \) is a different set. Alternatively, could \( l = 1 \) be possible? No, because then all four quantum numbers would be the same (n=2, l=1, ml=0, ms=+1/2), which is not allowed. So the possible value of \( Y \) is \( 0 \). Wait, but wait—another thought: the angular momentum quantum number \( l \) for \( n = 2 \) can be \( 0 \) or \( 1 \). Since the first electron has \( l = 1 \), the second electron can have \( l = 0 \) (because \( l = 1 \) would make the quantum numbers identical, which is forbidden by Pauli exclusion). So \( Y = 0 \).
Step2: Confirm valid \( l \) for \( n = 2 \)
For \( n = 2 \), \( l \in \{0, 1\} \). Given \( X = 1 \), \( Y \) must be a value of \( l \) for \( n = 2 \) that is not causing the same four quantum numbers. Since the other quantum numbers (\( n = 2 \), \( m_l = 0 \), \( m_s = +\frac{1}{2} \)) are fixed for the second electron, \( l \) (Y) must be different from \( X = 1 \) only if that would repeat the quantum numbers. Wait, no—if \( Y = 1 \), then the four quantum numbers are \( n = 2…
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
\( 0 \)