Sovi.AI - AI Math Tutor

Scan to solve math questions

QUESTION IMAGE

the population of a southern city is growing according to the exponenti…

Question

the population of a southern city is growing according to the exponential law. complete parts (a) and (b).
(a) if n is the population of the city and t is the time in years, express n as a function of t.
let ( n_0 ) represent the initial population of the city and let k be a positive constant that represents the annual growth rate of the citys population.
( n(t)=n_0e^{kt} )
(type an exact answer in terms of e.)
(b) if the population doubled in size over a 28 - month period and the current population is 50,000, what will the population be 4 years from now?
the population will be ( square ) people.
(do not round until the final answer. then round to the nearest whole number as needed.)

Explanation:

Part (b) Solution:

Step1: Determine the growth constant \( k \)

We know the population doubles in 28 months. Let's convert 28 months to years: \( 28 \) months \( = \frac{28}{12} = \frac{7}{3} \) years. The initial population \( N_0 \) (current population) is 50,000, and when \( t = \frac{7}{3} \), \( N(t) = 2 \times 50,000 = 100,000 \). Using the formula \( N(t) = N_0 e^{kt} \), we substitute:

$$ 100000 = 50000 e^{k \cdot \frac{7}{3}} $$

Divide both sides by 50,000:

$$ 2 = e^{\frac{7k}{3}} $$

Take the natural logarithm of both sides:

$$ \ln(2) = \frac{7k}{3} $$

Solve for \( k \):

$$ k = \frac{3\ln(2)}{7} $$

Step2: Calculate the population after 4 years

Now, we want to find the population after \( t = 4 \) years. The initial population \( N_0 = 50,000 \), and the growth constant \( k = \frac{3\ln(2)}{7} \). Using the formula \( N(t) = N_0 e^{kt} \), substitute \( t = 4 \), \( N_0 = 50000 \), and \( k = \frac{3\ln(2)}{7} \):

$$ N(4) = 50000 e^{\frac{3\ln(2)}{7} \cdot 4} $$

Simplify the exponent:

$$ \frac{12\ln(2)}{7} $$

Using the property \( e^{a\ln(b)} = b^a \), we can rewrite \( e^{\frac{12\ln(2)}{7}} = 2^{\frac{12}{7}} \):

$$ N(4) = 50000 \times 2^{\frac{12}{7}} $$

Calculate \( 2^{\frac{12}{7}} \approx 2^{1.7143} \approx 3.2490 \) (more accurately, using a calculator for \( 2^{\frac{12}{7}} \)):

$$ N(4) \approx 50000 \times 3.2490 \approx 162450 $$

(Wait, let's do the calculation more precisely. First, simplify \( e^{\frac{12\ln(2)}{7}} = (e^{\ln(2)})^{\frac{12}{7}} = 2^{\frac{12}{7}} \approx 2^{1.7142857} \approx e^{1.7142857 \times \ln(2)} \approx e^{1.7142857 \times 0.693147} \approx e^{1.187298} \approx 3.2768 \). Then \( 50000 \times 3.2768 \approx 163840 \)? Wait, let's recalculate the exponent:

Wait, \( \frac{3\ln(2)}{7} \times 4 = \frac{12\ln(2)}{7} \approx \frac{12 \times 0.693147}{7} \approx \frac{8.317764}{7} \approx 1.188252 \). Then \( e^{1.188252} \approx 3.279 \). Then \( 50000 \times 3.279 \approx 163950 \)? Wait, maybe a better way:

Wait, when we have \( N(t) = N_0 \times 2^{\frac{t}{T}} \), where \( T \) is the doubling time. The doubling time \( T = \frac{7}{3} \) years (since it doubles in \( \frac{7}{3} \) years). Wait, no, the doubling time formula: if it doubles in \( T \) years, then \( N(t) = N_0 \times 2^{\frac{t}{T}} \). Let's check: when \( t = T \), \( N(T) = N_0 \times 2^1 = 2N_0 \), which is correct. So here, \( T = \frac{7}{3} \) years. Then, the time from now is 4 years, so \( t = 4 \). Then:

$$ N(4) = 50000 \times 2^{\frac{4}{\frac{7}{3}}} = 50000 \times 2^{\frac{12}{7}} $$

Calculate \( 2^{\frac{12}{7}} \): \( 2^{12/7} = 2^{1 + 5/7} = 2 \times 2^{5/7} \approx 2 \times 1.6384 \approx 3.2768 \). Then \( 50000 \times 3.2768 = 163840 \). Wait, but let's do the exponent calculation again with the first method.

Wait, \( k = \frac{3\ln(2)}{7} \), so \( kt = \frac{3\ln(2)}{7} \times 4 = \frac{12\ln(2)}{7} \approx 1.188 \). Then \( e^{1.188} \approx 3.279 \), so \( 50000 \times 3.279 \approx 163950 \). But let's use a calculator for more precision. Let's compute \( 2^{12/7} \):

\( 12 \div 7 \approx 1.7142857 \)

\( 2^{1.7142857} \):

We know that \( 2^1 = 2 \), \( 2^2 = 4 \), \( 2^{1.714} \) is between 3 and 4. Let's use natural logarithm: \( \ln(2^{1.714}) = 1.714 \times \ln(2) \approx 1.714 \times 0.6931 \approx 1.188 \), so \( e^{1.188} \approx 3.279 \). Then \( 50000 \times 3.279 \approx 163950 \). But maybe the exact value using the first method:

Wait, let's go back to the exponent:

\( \frac{3\ln(2)}{7} \times 4 = \frac{12\ln(2)}{7} \)

So \( e^{\frac{12\ln(2)}{7}} = (e^{\ln(2)})^{\frac{12}{7}} = 2^{\frac{1…

Answer:

\boxed{163952} (or a more precise value depending on the calculation, but approximately 163950 - 164000)

Wait, let's do the calculation with more precision:

First, calculate \( k = 3\ln(2)/7 \approx 3*0.69314718056/7 \approx 2.07944154168/7 \approx 0.29706307738 \)

Then, \( kt = 0.29706307738 * 4 = 1.1882523095 \)

Then, \( e^{1.1882523095} \approx e^{1.1882523095} \)

Using a calculator, \( e^{1.1882523095} \approx 3.279032206 \)

Then, \( 50000 * 3.279032206 = 163951.6103 \), so rounding to the nearest whole number is 163952.

So the final answer is approximately 163952.