Question

scenario 2:
rural areas in the u.s. lack internet access. this has limited peoples access to jobs and health information. this has caused students to fall behind in skills and knowledge. internet providers say the cost of bringing internet access to rural areas is too high and will hurt their profits. residents claim the providers are discriminating against them. others say that without the internet, the economy in rural areas suffers greatly and causes people to be more dependent on government assistance.
what should the government do? check one.
regulate by requiring internet providers to serve rural areas
collaborate with private internet providers to bring service to rural areas
provide internet access itself
do nothing
other: explain:
why do you think this is the best choice to address this public issue?

Explanation:

Regulating internet providers to serve rural areas can ensure access without the government having to directly provide service. It addresses the issue of discrimination and economic impact mentioned (students falling behind, economy suffering) while leveraging existing providers' infrastructure. Collaborating might be less effective as providers are already resistant (claiming high costs). The government providing itself could be costly. Doing nothing ignores the problem.

Answer:

Regulate by requiring internet providers to serve rural areas