Question

question 4 of 10
in the 2015 case walker v. texas division, sons of confederate veterans, inc., the supreme court decided that the state of texas was not required to offer license plates featuring the confederate flag. what does this case indicate about first amendment rights in the 21st century?

a. limitations to protect the public interest are no longer placed on first amendment rights.
b. the first amendment continues to be interpreted through such means as the lemon test.
c. the first amendment is primarily protected by courts at the state level.
d. courts continue to find that first amendment rights are not absolute.

Explanation:

The First - Amendment guarantees certain freedoms but is not absolute. In the Walker v. Texas case, the state was not required to offer license plates with the Confederate flag, showing that the court recognized limitations on expression. This indicates that courts still find First - Amendment rights are not absolute.

Answer:

D. Courts continue to find that First Amendment rights are not absolute.