Question

mum bett was a pioneering figure in the fight against slavery. in 1781, bett overheard discussions about the massachusetts constitutions declaration that “all men are born free and equal.” with the help of abolitionist lawyer theodore sedgwick, she sued for her freedom, arguing that slavery violated this part of the states constitution. she won the case and, upon gaining her freedom, changed her name to elizabeth freemen. her case set the stage for massachusetts to abolish slavery in 1783.
which choice best states the main purpose of the text?
choose 1 answer:
a to argue that massachusettss constitution limits peoples freedoms
b to provide examples of important court cases in the state of massachusetts
c to give an overview of a historical figures role in ending slavery in massachusetts
d to contrast massachusettss laws in the late 1700s with the laws of other states at the time

Explanation:

The text focuses on Mum Bett (Elizabeth Freemen), her fight for freedom using the Massachusetts Constitution, and her role in Massachusetts abolishing slavery. It's about a historical figure's contribution to ending slavery in Massachusetts.

• Option A: The text doesn't argue the Constitution limits freedoms. It shows Mum Bett used it to gain freedom.
• Option B: Only one court - case (Mum Bett's) is mentioned, not multiple examples.
• Option C: Correct as it summarizes the text's focus on Mum Bett's role in ending slavery in Massachusetts.
• Option D: There's no comparison with other states' laws.

Answer:

C. To give an overview of a historical figure's role in ending slavery in Massachusetts