Question

money matters
there are many crucial factors that go into providing a solid education to students in public schools. knowledgeable, committed teachers, high - quality tools and equipment, and safe, clean facilities are only some of the provisions essential for an effective, positive learning environment. behind all of these is the most important provision of all: an adequate supply of funding. unfortunately, public school funding from local and federal sources is perpetually limited and often distributed unfairly. as a result, it is up to states to ensure that students in each district get a chance at a good education. funding must be increased, at least for lower - income districts, in order to come close to this goal.
select the two pieces of evidence that the author provides for the following supporting claim: increasing school funding for low - income districts can narrow the socioeconomic achievement gap.
long - term results show improved test scores for students in states that boosted their low - income public school funding.
in states that increased aid for low - income districts, graduation rates have also increased.
in states without additional aid for low - income districts, those districts’ test scores have decreased compared to scores in higher - income districts.
research has shown higher lifetime earnings for people who had access to high - quality preschool as children.

Explanation:

The claim is about the impact of increasing school funding for low - income districts on narrowing the socioeconomic achievement gap.

• The first piece of evidence ("Long - term results show improved test scores for students in states that boosted their low - income public school funding") directly links increased funding (for low - income schools) with an academic outcome (improved test scores), which is related to the achievement gap.
• The second piece of evidence ("In states that increased aid for low - income districts, graduation rates have also increased") shows another positive academic outcome (higher graduation rates) in response to increased funding for low - income districts. This also pertains to the achievement gap as graduation rates are an important measure of educational achievement.

The third option ("In states without additional aid for low - income districts, those districts’ test scores have decreased compared to scores in higher - income districts") is about the lack of funding and its impact, but it is more of a negative comparison rather than direct evidence of how increased funding narrows the gap. The fourth option ("Research has shown higher lifetime earnings for people who had access to high - quality preschool as children") is about preschool and lifetime earnings, not about the impact of increasing school funding for low - income districts on the socioeconomic achievement gap in the context of K - 12 education.

Answer:

1. Long - term results show improved test scores for students in states that boosted their low - income public school funding.
2. In states that increased aid for low - income districts, graduation rates have also increased.