Question

what was an argument of republicans against the league of nations?

a. it would allow foreign nations a say in who became president of
the united states.

b. it would require the united states to send representatives to
international meetings.

c. it would draw the united states into conflicts all over the world.

d. it would force the united states to give up territory taken from
american indians.

Explanation:

Republicans (especially isolationist - leaning ones) opposed the League of Nations mainly because they feared that U.S. membership in the League would obligate the U.S. to intervene in international conflicts (as the League could call for member states to take action in disputes), thus drawing the U.S. into conflicts globally. Option A is incorrect as the League had no role in U.S. presidential elections. Option B is incorrect as sending representatives to meetings was not a major opposition point. Option D is incorrect as the League had nothing to do with U.S. territory taken from American Indians.

Answer:

C. It would draw the United States into conflicts all over the world.