Question

a warrant is permission from a judge based on reasonable suspicion
san diego resident jim tharayil added that he thinks the policy could be abused. he told
san diego 6 news that he can imagine police officers using something else to pull you
over and then using this to look through your cell phone.
protection over privacy
the police need help keeping the streets safe, say supporters of cell phone searches.
officers in shafter, calif., note that the policy has already been helpful. we were able to
establish who the arrested people were in contact with. it helped us to find who may also
be involved in that crime, detective chris grider told bakersfields 23abc.
some people also believe that the policy will deter people from committing crimes. the
police now have better means to find out if youre guilty, california resident chris eddy told
san diego 6 news.
furthermore, supporters of the ruling say it does not violate the fourth amendment. if
youve already been arrested with reasonable evidence, they say, then it is fair for the police
to search through anything on you.
abuse of power
stop snooping through smartphones, argue opponents of the new ruling. people could
have ... pictures in there, like of their girlfriends, that they dont want somebody else to see,
and it would be an invasion of privacy not only for them but the other person also,
california resident valinten perez told 23abc.
justice kathryn m. werdegar, one of the judges who opposed the decision, says that police
officers should have to obtain a warrant. it is unfair of police officers to rummage at
leisure through the wealth of personal and business information that can be carried on a
mobile phone ... merely because the device was taken from an arrestees person, she
says.

1. which statement best describes how opponents feel about the cell phone

patrol policy?
opponents feel that the policy will prove helpful to law enforcement.
opponents feel the policy is too restrictive in nature.
opponents feel the policy could be easily abused by law enforcement.
opponents feel the policy could lead to more arrests.

1. which piece of text evidence best supports your answer for number one? *

police officers in california have a new way to fight crime.
we were able to establish who the arrested people were in contact with.
if youve already been arrested with reasonable evidence, they say, then it is fair for
the police to search through anything on you.
it is unfair of police officers to rummage at leisure through the wealth of personal
and business information that can be carried on a mobile phone ...

Explanation:

1. In the "Abuse of Power" section, opponents' concerns about privacy invasion and lack of warrant (implying potential abuse) align with the idea that the policy could be easily misused by law enforcement.
2. The quote about police officers "rummaging at leisure" through personal info without a warrant directly supports the abuse - potential argument from question 1.

Answer:

1. Opponents feel the policy could be easily abused by law enforcement.
2. "It is unfair of police officers to 'rummage at leisure through the wealth of personal and business information that can be carried on a mobile phone...'"