Question

using what you have learned, match each supreme court decision to the correct case.
defendants in criminal cases are entitled to an attorney regardless of whether they can afford one.
people who are arrested must be informed of their constitutional rights.
mandatory life sentences without parole are unconstitutional for juveniles.
people have a reasonable expectation of privacy even when they are outside their homes.
a search warrant must be obtained in order to search the contents of a cell phone.
evidence obtained in an illegal search is inadmissible in court.
case
miranda v. arizona, about a confession by a suspect who did not know his rights
gideon v. wainwright, about a defendant who was forced to represent himself
katz v. united states, about a public phone being recorded by the fbi
mapp v. ohio, about a home that was searched without a warrant
riley v. california, about a cell phone being searched for evidence
miller v. alabama, about a fourteen-year-old boy convicted of murder
supreme court decision

Explanation:

To solve this matching problem, we analyze each case and its corresponding Supreme Court decision based on the key details:

1. Miranda v. Arizona: Involves a suspect unaware of rights during confession. Matches "People who are arrested must be informed of their constitutional rights."
2. Gideon v. Wainwright: Involves a defendant forced to self - represent. Matches "Defendants in criminal cases are entitled to an attorney regardless of whether they can afford one."
3. Katz v. United States: Involves a public phone being recorded (privacy outside home). Matches "People have a reasonable expectation of privacy even when they are outside their homes."
4. Mapp v. Ohio: Involves a home search without a warrant. Matches "Evidence obtained in an illegal search is inadmissible in court."
5. Riley v. California: Involves a cell phone search for evidence. Matches "A search warrant must be obtained in order to search the contents of a cell phone."
6. Miller v. Alabama: Involves a 14 - year - old convicted of murder (juvenile sentencing). Matches "Mandatory life sentences without parole are unconstitutional for juveniles."

Answer:

• Miranda v. Arizona, about a confession by a suspect who did not know his rights: People who are arrested must be informed of their constitutional rights.
• Gideon v. Wainwright, about a defendant who was forced to represent himself: Defendants in criminal cases are entitled to an attorney regardless of whether they can afford one.
• Katz v. United States, about a public phone being recorded by the FBI: People have a reasonable expectation of privacy even when they are outside their homes.
• Mapp v. Ohio, about a home that was searched without a warrant: Evidence obtained in an illegal search is inadmissible in court.
• Riley v. California, about a cell phone being searched for evidence: A search warrant must be obtained in order to search the contents of a cell phone.
• Miller v. Alabama, about a fourteen - year - old boy convicted of murder: Mandatory life sentences without parole are unconstitutional for juveniles.