Question

some may believe that using the text - to - speech function while driving in order to text their friends and family members is a way around the ban on texting while driving. however, it has been proven that it is not the actual process of texting while driving that distracts the driver. it is the cognitive distraction, or the thinking required in order to complete the task, that distracts drivers. the majority of drivers will still be distracted no matter if they are using the text - to - speech function or the traditional form of texting. therefore, the only answer to the texting and driving problem is for states to create laws completely banning the use of phones while driving.
which statement best represents the claim? *
4 points
○ cell phones are dangerous.
○ texting and driving should be banned.
○ using a cell phone while driving, whether hands - free or not, is a distraction for drivers.
○ drivers need to learn how to stay focused while using the text - to - speech function on their phone.

Explanation:

The text argues that cognitive distraction (not just the act of texting) from using phones (even text - to - speech) while driving is an issue. The conclusion is that states should ban phone use while driving. The claim is about banning texting and driving (as it's part of the broader phone - use - while - driving ban argument). The first option is too general. The third option is a supporting detail (explaining why texting and driving should be banned). The fourth option goes against the text's idea (the text says banning is needed, not learning to focus).

Answer:

Texting and driving should be banned.