Question

read the story.
two young chess enthusiasts, bruno and gloria, faced off in an intense match in the state championship. as their pieces glided across the board, silence filled the tournament hall. gloria raced her queen aggressively across the board and well ahead of her pawns while bruno, ever guarded, moved a knight to form a protective wall.
the clock ticked, and gloria made a bold and risky move, sacrificing her rook to create an opening. bruno had anticipated this, and he was able to slide a bishop into position to protect his queen. it was a nail - biting showdown.
with sweat on their brows, they played on; each players style was constantly challenged and tested. finally, glorias assertive attack broke through, and she toppled brunos king in a thrilling victory.
based on the story, how is brunos approach to chess different from glorias approach?
bruno plays more cautiously than gloria does.
bruno follows his instincts more than gloria does.
bruno experiments with new moves more than gloria does.
bruno takes chess more seriously than gloria does.
submit

Explanation:

The story describes Gloria as making "bold and risky" moves (like sacrificing her rook) and racing her queen "aggressively" while Bruno is "ever guarded" and moves a knight to form a "protective wall". This shows that Bruno's approach is more cautious compared to Gloria's more aggressive and risky play - style.

Answer:

Bruno plays more cautiously than Gloria does.