Question

read the excerpt from parvatis argument in favor of using cell phones in class
todays cell phones are not just phones, they are little computers. that means they are effective research tools. students can use them to access dictionaries, encyclopedias, and other reference materials. they can search for articles, videos, and images. in my civics class, our teacher even held mock elections, and we voted using our cell phones
what is the best evaluation of parvatis evidence?
it is irrelevant and insufficient, because she discusses using computers rather than phones
it is irrelevant and insufficient, because her evidence relies solely on her own experience
it is relevant and sufficient, because she gives convincing examples of how phones support classwork
it is relevant and insufficient, because she provides general reasons without specific examples

Explanation:

Parvali's evidence directly addresses using cell phones in class (relevant) by providing specific examples: accessing reference materials (dictionaries, encyclopedias) and a class activity (mock elections via phones). These examples support her claim that phones are effective tools for classwork, making the evidence sufficient.

Answer:

It is relevant and sufficient because she gives convincing examples of how phones support classwork