Question

question 5 (1 point) saved david humes argument that prescriptions cannot be logically derived from factual claims, and his view that morality is based on feelings, helped support elements of relativism. true false question 6 (1 point) saved a positive argument sometimes made in defense of moral relativism is that it promotes tolerance by encouraging understanding of other cultures on their own terms. true false question 7 (1 point) saved one common objection to moral relativism is that it implies that \anything goes,\ meaning obvious moral wrongs become acceptable if they align with a cultures norms. true false

Explanation:

• Question 5: David Hume's is - ought problem (prescriptions from facts) and his view on morality as feeling - based support relativism. Relativism holds that moral values are not absolute. If morality is based on feelings (which can vary) and prescriptions can't be derived from facts (so no objective moral facts), it supports relativism.
• Question 6: Moral relativism, by emphasizing understanding cultures on their own terms, can promote tolerance. If we don't impose our own moral standards but try to understand others', it can lead to more tolerant attitudes.
• Question 7: A common criticism of moral relativism is the "anything goes" problem. If moral right - wrong is just based on cultural norms, then even clearly immoral acts (like genocide, if a culture's norms allowed it in a perverse way) could be seen as acceptable.

Answer:

Question 5: True
Question 6: True
Question 7: True