Question

consider this claim: graphic novels should not be considered literature; they rely too heavily on images, rather than the written word, for expression of thoughts and ideas. now consider how someone might argue against this. which sentence presents the stronger and more reasonable counterclaim to the above claim? graphic novels often have themes and prose befitting the traditional definition of literature: written works of excellent quality and lasting value. graphic novels should be considered literature because many modern graphic novels are longer than so - called classic books like heart of darkness or the pearl.

Explanation:

To determine the stronger counterclaim, we analyze the logic. The original claim argues graphic novels aren't literature due to heavy image reliance. The first counterclaim connects graphic novels to the traditional definition of literature (themes, prose, quality, lasting value), directly addressing the core of what literature is. The second counterclaim uses length (a weak criterion, as length doesn't define literature) to argue, which is less reasonable. So the first sentence is stronger.

Answer:

Graphic novels often have themes and prose befitting the traditional definition of literature: written works of excellent quality and lasting value.