Question

consider this claim: it is better to rely on gps navigation than print maps because gps navigation systems are more accurate and easier to use. now consider how someone might argue against this. which sentence presents the stronger and more reasonable counterclaim to the above claim? many print maps cover a large area, even an entire state, so as long as you stay within that region you can always find your way. gps systems become useless when your device runs out of power or when you drive somewhere without cellular service.

Explanation:

To find a strong counterclaim, we need to address the weaknesses of GPS (compared to print maps) or strengths of print maps. The first option focuses on print maps' coverage but doesn't directly counter GPS's accuracy/ease. The second option points out GPS's limitations (power/cellular issues), which are significant drawbacks, making it a stronger counter as it directly challenges the claim that GPS is better by showing situations where it fails, unlike print maps (which don't need power/cellular).

Answer:

The second sentence: "GPS systems become useless when your device runs out of power or when you drive somewhere without cellular service."