Question

it is a bit more complicated than this, but these are the 2 approaches in a nutshell. naturally, the 2 views work together, and it does not have to be either/or, but many historians fall into one camp or the other based on which view they give more importance to. what is historiography? one parting thought. much of what we have been discussing in this lesson is considered historiography. what? what is that? historiography is the history of history. in other words, it is the study of how historical views change over time. for example, during certain periods of time, the american revolution was viewed from a certain perspective. as new information becomes available, however, new views emerge. also, current political and social norms affect how we interact with the past. our perception of the past is very much shaped by the present. that is about all i wanted to mention on historiography – it seemed fitting to this lesson, so i figured i would throw it in as a sort of “freebie.” lesson summary lets review. historical change is an all - encompassing term used to describe the changing of events over the course of time. historical change happens constantly and includes both major events and seemingly insignificant events. historical change takes place through the process of cause and effect. one event, trend, or movement leads to another, and the cycle continues endlessly. scholars who study historical change have developed two distinct views: intentionalism, which emphasizes the role of important figures in history; and functionalism, which emphasizes the role of broader socio - political and economic trends. finally, historiography is the study of how historical interpretations change over time. ****************************** recognition: selected response: in the space provided, write the capital letter of the choice that best completes each sentence or answers each question. 1. what is the view that historical change is primarily caused by the actions and influence of important historical figures? a. functionalism b. intentionalism c. biographicalism d. structuralism 2. why are historical changes so difficult to predict? a. historical changes depend on long chains of causes and effects, making it hard to know future effects if their causes have not even happened yet. b. historical changes are generally quite easy to predict. c. history is not a science, and thus does not have the predictive power of a science. d. history is still a very young discipline, and has yet to mature into a system capable of making predictions.

Explanation:

1. The text states that intentionalism emphasizes the role of important figures in history for historical change.
2. Historical changes occur through long - chains of cause and effect, and since future causes are unknown, future effects are hard to predict.

Answer:

1. B. Intentionalism
2. A. Historical changes depend on long chains of causes and effects, making it hard to know future effects if their causes have not even happened yet.