Question

which claim is the most effective for the argument that the minimum age to get a drivers license should be changed to 18?
o some 16 - year - olds help out by driving their younger siblings to school, so changing the minimum driving age to 18 would be a problem for them.
o some 16 - year - olds are mature enough to drive, but changing the minimum driving age to 18 would be an overall benefit for everyone.
o changing the minimum driving age to 18 would mean safer roads for everyone, since less - experienced drivers are more likely to have accidents.
o changing the minimum driving age to 18 shouldnt cause too much of a problem, because its only two years older than 16.

Explanation:

An effective claim for raising the driving - age to 18 should focus on a strong, widely - applicable reason. The first option argues against the change. The second option is a bit weak as it acknowledges some 16 - year - olds are ready. The fourth option doesn't provide a strong reason. The third option presents a clear, safety - related benefit for everyone by reducing accidents from less - experienced drivers.

Answer:

Changing the minimum driving age to 18 would mean safer roads for everyone, since less - experienced drivers are more likely to have accidents.