Question

scenario: justice scalias approach to constitutional interpretation
during oral arguments in a case involving the use of gps tracking devices by police, justice antonin scalia argues that the constitution should be interpreted based on its original public meaning at the time it was written, not according to modern views of privacy or technology. he states that judges must apply the text as it was understood by the framers, even if societys values have changed.
question: justice scalias reasoning in this scenario best reflects which judicial philosophy?
living constitutionalism — interpreting the constitution as an evolving document that adapts to modern needs
judicial activism — expanding constitutional interpretation to new social issues
originalism — interpreting the constitution based on its meaning at the time it was adopted
pragmatism — deciding cases based on practical outcomes rather than legal principles

Explanation:

Originalism interprets the Constitution based on its meaning at the time it was adopted. In the scenario, Justice Scalia argues the Constitution should be interpreted based on its original public meaning when written, not modern views. This aligns with Originalism's core tenet of adhering to the Constitution's meaning at its adoption.

Answer:

Originalism — interpreting the Constitution based on its meaning at the time it was adopted.