Question

sartre argues that when he speaks of forlornness, he means that
we are not responsible for our actions
we can never truly understand human nature
god does not exist, so we must face all of the consequences of this
all of the above.
question 16
5 pts
sartre criticizes certain atheists in the 1880s that wanted to create an atheist ethics on the grounds that

they fail to realize that, without god, there can be no a priori standard of good to which everyone is bound to conform.

there can be no salvation without embracing our lord and savior jesus christ

atheists are generally very immoral people

none of the above

Explanation:

For the first question, Sartre's concept of forlornness in existentialism emphasizes that without God (as per his atheistic - existentialist view), humans must face the consequences. The first option is wrong as Sartre believes in human responsibility. The second option is not related to forlornness. The third option aligns with his view.

For the second question, Sartre, as an atheist, would not support the second option (which is a religious - Christian statement). He also does not claim atheists are immoral. His criticism of the 1880s atheists is that without God, there is no a - priori good standard (which is a key tenet of his existentialist ethics).

Answer:

First question: God does not exist, so we must face all of the consequences of this.
Second question: they fail to realize that, without God, there can be no a priori standard of good to which everyone is bound to conform.