Question

the number of times a player has golfed in ones lifetime is compared to the number of strokes it takes the player to complete 18 holes. the correlation coefficient relating the two variables is -0.26. which best describes the strength of the correlation, and what is true about the causation between the variables? it is a weak negative correlation, and it is not likely causal. it is a weak negative correlation, and it is likely causal. it is a strong negative correlation, and it is not likely causal. it is a strong negative correlation, and it is likely causal.

Explanation:

• The correlation coefficient \(r = - 0.26\). Since \(|r|=0.26<0.5\), it is a weak correlation.
• Just because there is a correlation (even if it were stronger), correlation does not imply causation. There could be other factors (e.g., practice, natural talent) that affect both the number of holes - in - one and the number of strokes to complete 18 holes.

Answer:

It is a weak negative correlation, and it is not likely causal.