Question

compare the student text with the source.
source: carolyn williams, \a natural label on food means next to nothing. heres why.\ published on cookinglight.com, 2016:
here’s the situation:
atural\ really guarantees little to nothing about a food’s quality, ingredients, or how it was grown or raised—meaning the food could (or could not) contain artificial ingredients, gmos, chemicals, hormones, and antibiotics.
student text:
williams asserts that just because a food is labeled
atural,\ that doesn’t necessarily mean that it is free of antibiotics, chemicals, hormones, gmos, or artificial ingredients.
is the student text plagiarized?
no, it is not plagiarized.
yes, because it fails to cite the source.
yes, because it fails to use quotation marks and fails to cite the source.

Explanation:

El texto del estudiante rephrases la idea de la fuente sin citarla ni usar comillas para la frase de Williams. Plagio ocurre cuando se usa contenido sin atribuir, y aquí el estudiante no citó la fuente ni usó comillas para la declaración de Williams, cumpliendo con la definición de plagio (fallar en citar y en usar comillas para citas directas o rephrasing sin atribución). La tercera opción es incorrecta (no es plagio), la segunda solo menciona falta de citación, pero la tercera opción (Yes, because it fails to use quotation marks and fails to cite the source) es correcta porque incluye ambos aspectos: falta de comillas para la frase de Williams y falta de citación de la fuente.

Answer:

Yes, because it fails to use quotation marks and fails to cite the source.