QUESTION IMAGE
Question
- what causes us to overeat? one surprising factor might be the material of the plate on which our food is served. williamson, block, and keller (2016) gave n = 68 participants two donuts each and measured the amount of food that was wasted by each participant. in an independent-samples design, participants received their donuts either on a disposable paper plate or on a reusable plastic plate. data like those observed by the authors are listed below.
| paper plate (grams of wasted food) | plastic plate (grams of wasted food) |
|---|---|
| 35 | 31 |
| 34 | 36 |
| 36 | 30 |
| 40 | 34 |
| 34 | 33 |
| 33 | 37 |
| 39 | 29 |
a. test the hypothesis that participants who received donuts on a paper plate wasted more food than participants who were served donuts on a plastic, reusable plate. use α = .05, two - tailed.
b. construct a 95% confidence interval to estimate the size of the mean difference.
c. write the results as they would appear in a scien -
Step1: Calculate means and standard deviations
For Paper Plate (let's call this Group 1):
Data: 37, 35, 34, 36, 40, 34, 33, 39
$n_1 = 8$
$\bar{x}_1=\frac{37 + 35+34+36+40+34+33+39}{8}=\frac{288}{8} = 36$
$s_1=\sqrt{\frac{\sum(x_1 - \bar{x}_1)^2}{n_1 - 1}}$
Calculating deviations:
$(37 - 36)^2 = 1$, $(35 - 36)^2 = 1$, $(34 - 36)^2 = 4$, $(36 - 36)^2 = 0$, $(40 - 36)^2 = 16$, $(34 - 36)^2 = 4$, $(33 - 36)^2 = 9$, $(39 - 36)^2 = 9$
Sum of squares: $1+1 + 4+0+16+4+9+9=44$
$s_1=\sqrt{\frac{44}{7}}\approx2.507$
For Plastic Plate (Group 2):
Data: 34, 31, 36, 30, 34, 33, 37, 29
$n_2 = 8$
$\bar{x}_2=\frac{34+31+36+30+34+33+37+29}{8}=\frac{264}{8}=33$
$s_2=\sqrt{\frac{\sum(x_2 - \bar{x}_2)^2}{n_2 - 1}}$
Calculating deviations:
$(34 - 33)^2 = 1$, $(31 - 33)^2 = 4$, $(36 - 33)^2 = 9$, $(30 - 33)^2 = 9$, $(34 - 33)^2 = 1$, $(33 - 33)^2 = 0$, $(37 - 33)^2 = 16$, $(29 - 33)^2 = 16$
Sum of squares: $1+4 + 9+9+1+0+16+16=56$
$s_2=\sqrt{\frac{56}{7}}=\sqrt{8}\approx2.828$
Step2: Calculate pooled variance (for independent samples t - test)
$S_p^2=\frac{(n_1 - 1)s_1^2+(n_2 - 1)s_2^2}{n_1 + n_2 - 2}=\frac{7\times(2.507)^2+7\times(2.828)^2}{14}$
$7\times6.285 + 7\times8=43.995+56 = 99.995$
$S_p^2=\frac{99.995}{14}\approx7.1425$
$S_p=\sqrt{7.1425}\approx2.672$
Step3: Calculate t - statistic
$t=\frac{\bar{x}_1-\bar{x}_2}{S_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2}}}=\frac{36 - 33}{2.672\sqrt{\frac{1}{8}+\frac{1}{8}}}=\frac{3}{2.672\sqrt{\frac{2}{8}}}=\frac{3}{2.672\times0.5}\approx2.245$
Step4: Determine critical value and make decision (for part a)
Degrees of freedom $df=n_1 + n_2 - 2=14$
For two - tailed test with $\alpha = 0.05$, critical value $t_{crit}=\pm2.145$
Since calculated $t = 2.245>2.145$, we reject the null hypothesis.
Step5: Calculate confidence interval (for part b)
The formula for confidence interval for $\mu_1-\mu_2$ is $(\bar{x}_1-\bar{x}_2)\pm t_{\alpha/2,df}S_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2}}$
$\bar{x}_1-\bar{x}_2 = 3$
$t_{\alpha/2,14}=2.145$ (for 95% confidence, two - tailed)
$S_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2}}=2.672\times0.5 = 1.336$
Margin of error $E = 2.145\times1.336\approx2.866$
Confidence interval: $3\pm2.866=(0.134,5.866)$
Part a Answer:
We reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence at $\alpha = 0.05$ (two - tailed) to conclude that there is a difference in the amount of wasted food between paper plate and plastic plate groups. The calculated t - statistic ($t = 2.245$) is greater than the critical value ($t_{crit}=2.145$) for $df = 14$.
Part b Answer:
The 95% confidence interval for the mean difference is approximately $(0.13,5.87)$ (rounded to two decimal places).
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
Step1: Calculate means and standard deviations
For Paper Plate (let's call this Group 1):
Data: 37, 35, 34, 36, 40, 34, 33, 39
$n_1 = 8$
$\bar{x}_1=\frac{37 + 35+34+36+40+34+33+39}{8}=\frac{288}{8} = 36$
$s_1=\sqrt{\frac{\sum(x_1 - \bar{x}_1)^2}{n_1 - 1}}$
Calculating deviations:
$(37 - 36)^2 = 1$, $(35 - 36)^2 = 1$, $(34 - 36)^2 = 4$, $(36 - 36)^2 = 0$, $(40 - 36)^2 = 16$, $(34 - 36)^2 = 4$, $(33 - 36)^2 = 9$, $(39 - 36)^2 = 9$
Sum of squares: $1+1 + 4+0+16+4+9+9=44$
$s_1=\sqrt{\frac{44}{7}}\approx2.507$
For Plastic Plate (Group 2):
Data: 34, 31, 36, 30, 34, 33, 37, 29
$n_2 = 8$
$\bar{x}_2=\frac{34+31+36+30+34+33+37+29}{8}=\frac{264}{8}=33$
$s_2=\sqrt{\frac{\sum(x_2 - \bar{x}_2)^2}{n_2 - 1}}$
Calculating deviations:
$(34 - 33)^2 = 1$, $(31 - 33)^2 = 4$, $(36 - 33)^2 = 9$, $(30 - 33)^2 = 9$, $(34 - 33)^2 = 1$, $(33 - 33)^2 = 0$, $(37 - 33)^2 = 16$, $(29 - 33)^2 = 16$
Sum of squares: $1+4 + 9+9+1+0+16+16=56$
$s_2=\sqrt{\frac{56}{7}}=\sqrt{8}\approx2.828$
Step2: Calculate pooled variance (for independent samples t - test)
$S_p^2=\frac{(n_1 - 1)s_1^2+(n_2 - 1)s_2^2}{n_1 + n_2 - 2}=\frac{7\times(2.507)^2+7\times(2.828)^2}{14}$
$7\times6.285 + 7\times8=43.995+56 = 99.995$
$S_p^2=\frac{99.995}{14}\approx7.1425$
$S_p=\sqrt{7.1425}\approx2.672$
Step3: Calculate t - statistic
$t=\frac{\bar{x}_1-\bar{x}_2}{S_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2}}}=\frac{36 - 33}{2.672\sqrt{\frac{1}{8}+\frac{1}{8}}}=\frac{3}{2.672\sqrt{\frac{2}{8}}}=\frac{3}{2.672\times0.5}\approx2.245$
Step4: Determine critical value and make decision (for part a)
Degrees of freedom $df=n_1 + n_2 - 2=14$
For two - tailed test with $\alpha = 0.05$, critical value $t_{crit}=\pm2.145$
Since calculated $t = 2.245>2.145$, we reject the null hypothesis.
Step5: Calculate confidence interval (for part b)
The formula for confidence interval for $\mu_1-\mu_2$ is $(\bar{x}_1-\bar{x}_2)\pm t_{\alpha/2,df}S_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2}}$
$\bar{x}_1-\bar{x}_2 = 3$
$t_{\alpha/2,14}=2.145$ (for 95% confidence, two - tailed)
$S_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2}}=2.672\times0.5 = 1.336$
Margin of error $E = 2.145\times1.336\approx2.866$
Confidence interval: $3\pm2.866=(0.134,5.866)$
Part a Answer:
We reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence at $\alpha = 0.05$ (two - tailed) to conclude that there is a difference in the amount of wasted food between paper plate and plastic plate groups. The calculated t - statistic ($t = 2.245$) is greater than the critical value ($t_{crit}=2.145$) for $df = 14$.
Part b Answer:
The 95% confidence interval for the mean difference is approximately $(0.13,5.87)$ (rounded to two decimal places).