Question

why was the kellogg-briand pact considered useless? *
1 point
it failed to include several of the strongest military powers.
it didnt prevent war; it only punished countries that started wars.
it provided no means of enforcing the
o war\ agreement.
it made the process of repaying war debts too easy.

representatives of eight countries gathered at the washington conference * 1 point
in 1921 to discuss

economic aid to europe.
reparations.
the league of nations.
disarmament.

Explanation:

First Question (Kellogg - Briand Pact)

The Kellogg - Briand Pact aimed to outlaw war but had no enforcement mechanism. The first option is wrong as many major powers signed it. The second is wrong as it didn't have a punishment system. The fourth is irrelevant to war prevention. The third option correctly states it lacked enforcement for the "no war" agreement.

The Washington Conference (1921 - 1922) was about disarmament (naval disarmament mainly) and East - Asian issues. Economic aid to Europe, reparations, and the League of Nations were not the main topics. So the correct answer is about disarmament.

Answer:

C. It provided no means of enforcing the "no war" agreement.

Second Question (Washington Conference)