Question

which statement would best conclude an evaluation of dan delucas argument in \dylans nobel prize settles debate: rock lyrics are poetry\?
deluca shows an impressive knowledge of the entire range of dylans creative output.
overall, delucas wide - ranging evidence will prove that rock lyrics are indeed poetry.
i find the examples of internal rhyme to be the most convincing evidence deluca offers.
deluca calls on novelists and a us president for their opinions of the nobel committees decision.

Explanation:

An evaluation conclusion should summarize the overall argument. Option B does this by stating that DeLuca's evidence proves rock lyrics are poetry. Option A focuses on knowledge of output, not the argument's conclusion. Option C is about a specific example, not the overall conclusion. Option D is about who DeLuca calls on, not the conclusion of the argument.

Answer:

Overall, DeLuca’s wide - ranging evidence will prove that rock lyrics are indeed poetry.