Question

what statement best articulates a noninterventionist argument against american imperialism? (1 point) the u.s. is obligated to intervene in foreign nations. american expansion exploits the peoples of other nations. the u.s. is obligated to share christianity and american values. the use of force to obtain military bases in other countries is justified

Explanation:

A non - interventionist argument against American imperialism would focus on the negative aspects of American expansion. The statement "American expansion exploits the peoples of other nations" directly criticizes American imperialism by highlighting the harm it causes to other nations' people, which is in line with a non - interventionist stance that opposes such exploitative actions. The other options either support intervention (e.g., "The U.S. is obligated to intervene in foreign nations", "The use of force to obtain military bases in other countries is justified") or are related to imperialist justifications (e.g., "The U.S. is obligated to share Christianity and American values").

Answer:

American expansion exploits the peoples of other nations.