Sovi.AI - AI Math Tutor

Scan to solve math questions

QUESTION IMAGE

two pairs of angles and two pairs of sides? how could we justify that △…

Question

two pairs of angles and two pairs of sides?
how could we justify that △abc is congruent to △def?
choose 2 answers:
a side - side - side congruence
b angle - side - angle congruence
c side - angle - side congruence
d hypotenuse - leg congruence

Explanation:

Step1: Analyze Triangle Properties

First, observe that both \(\triangle A'B'C'\) and \(\triangle DEF\) are right triangles (since they have a right angle, as indicated by the right-angle symbol).

Step2: Check Hypotenuse-Leg (HL)

For right triangles, Hypotenuse-Leg (HL) congruence states that if the hypotenuse and one leg of a right triangle are congruent to the hypotenuse and one leg of another right triangle, the triangles are congruent. In \(\triangle A'B'C'\) and \(\triangle DEF\), the hypotenuses: let's check the sides. For \(\triangle A'B'C'\), the hypotenuse (assuming the right angle is at \(A'\) or \(C'\)) – wait, looking at the sides: \(A'B' = 2.5\), \(B'C' = 4.5\)? Wait, no, wait the red triangle \(A'B'C'\): the sides are \(A'B' = 2.5\), \(B'C' = 4.5\)? Wait, no, the blue triangle \(ABC\) has sides \(AB = 5\), \(BC = 9\), right angle at \(A\). The red triangle \(A'B'C'\): right angle, sides \(A'B' = 2.5\), \(B'C' = 4.5\)? Wait, no, the other triangle \(DEF\): \(DE = 2.5\), \(EF = 4.5\), right angle at \(D\). Wait, actually, for right triangles, HL: hypotenuse and leg. Let's see: in \(\triangle A'B'C'\) (right triangle) and \(\triangle DEF\) (right triangle), the legs: \(A'B' = DE = 2.5\), and the hypotenuses? Wait, no, maybe the legs and the included angle? Wait, no, let's check the angles. Wait, the right angle is one angle, then a leg, then the hypotenuse. Wait, also, Side-Angle-Side (SAS): if two sides and the included angle are congruent. The right angle is the included angle between the two legs. So for \(\triangle A'B'C'\) and \(\triangle DEF\), the two legs: one leg is \(2.5\) (e.g., \(A'B'\) and \(DE\)), the other leg? Wait, no, the other side: \(B'C' = 4.5\) and \(EF = 4.5\)? Wait, no, \(DEF\): \(DE = 2.5\), \(DF\) (the leg) – wait, the right angle is at \(D\), so \(DE\) and \(DF\) are legs, \(EF\) is hypotenuse? Wait, no, let's re-express:

For \(\triangle A'B'C'\) (right triangle, right angle at, say, \(A'\)): legs are \(A'B' = 2.5\) and \(A'C'\) (wait, no, the right angle symbol is at \(A'\) or \(C'\)? The diagram shows the right angle at \(A\) for \(ABC\), at \(A'\) for \(A'B'C'\), and at \(D\) for \(DEF\). So \(\triangle A'B'C'\) (right-angled at \(A'\)): legs \(A'B' = 2.5\), \(A'C'\) (unknown), hypotenuse \(B'C' = 4.5\). \(\triangle DEF\) (right-angled at \(D\)): legs \(DE = 2.5\), \(DF\) (unknown), hypotenuse \(EF = 4.5\). So hypotenuse \(B'C' = EF = 4.5\), leg \(A'B' = DE = 2.5\), so HL applies (hypotenuse and leg congruent). Also, SAS: the two legs (2.5 and the other leg? Wait, no, the right angle is the included angle between the two legs. Wait, if we take the two legs: \(A'B' = DE = 2.5\), and the included angle (right angle) is congruent, and the other leg? Wait, no, maybe the legs are \(2.5\) and the other side? Wait, no, maybe I made a mistake. Wait, the correct congruence criteria here: since they are right triangles, HL (Hypotenuse-Leg) is applicable (option D). Also, SAS: because the two legs (the two sides forming the right angle) and the included right angle. So SAS: two sides (legs) and included angle (right angle) congruent, so SAS (option C). Wait, but let's confirm:

  • HL: Hypotenuse-Leg: for right triangles, if hypotenuse and one leg are congruent, then triangles are congruent. Here, hypotenuse \(B'C' = EF = 4.5\), leg \(A'B' = DE = 2.5\), so HL (D) is correct.
  • SAS: Side-Angle-Side: two sides and the included angle. The two sides are the legs (2.5 and, wait, no, the other leg? Wait, no, the right angle is between the two legs. So if one leg is 2.5, the other leg? Wait, no, maybe the…

Answer:

C. Side-angle-side congruence, D. Hypotenuse-leg congruence