Question

think of you last models form lesson 1
what is missing from our current model? what do we need to know to develop solutions other than gasoline?

our current models often overlook the inefficiencies inherent in gasoline - powered systems
write a comment

whats best for our environment but whats most affective
write a comment

my model fails to show what is best for our environment. we need to know the effects of each source of power, whether it is petroleum or coal etc. on the planet.
write a comment

what s not shown
write a comment

i think its not showing whats the best for the planet

it missing whats best for the planet

its missing whats best for the environment we live in.

my model doesnt show the more efficient
write a comment

share your thoughts

Explanation:

To determine what's missing from the combustion model and what's needed for non - gasoline solutions, we analyze the context. The current model (like the combustion diagram) likely misses details about energy efficiency, environmental impact of different fuels, and alternative energy sources' feasibility. For developing non - gasoline solutions, we need to know the energy output, environmental footprint (e.g., emissions, resource depletion), and practicality (e.g., cost, infrastructure) of alternatives like electricity, biofuels, or hydrogen. The existing comments highlight the lack of environmental and efficiency considerations, so the missing elements in the model could be these aspects, and the knowledge needed includes fuel - specific impacts and alternative fuel properties.

Answer:

The current model may miss details about the efficiency of gasoline - powered systems, the environmental impact of different energy sources, and the comparative analysis of alternative fuels. To develop non - gasoline solutions, we need to know the energy efficiency, environmental effects (emissions, resource use), and practicality (cost, infrastructure requirements) of alternative energy sources (e.g., electricity, biofuels, hydrogen).