Question

text 1
public policy researcher anthony fowler studied the history of elections in australia, a country that requires citizens to vote. fowler argues that requiring citizens to vote leads to a significant increase in voters who would otherwise not have the time or motivation to vote. thus, election results in countries that require citizens to vote better reflect the preferences of the country as a whole.

text 2
governments in democratic countries function better when more people vote. however, forcing people to vote may have negative consequences. shane p. singh and jason roy studied what happens when a country requires its citizens to vote. they found that when people feel forced to vote, they tend to spend less time looking for information about their choices when voting. as a result, votes from these voters may not reflect their actual preferences.

based on the texts, how would singh and roy (text 2) most likely respond to the research discussed in text 1?
a. only countries of a certain population size should implement mandatory voting.

b. people who are forced to vote are likely to become politically engaged in other ways, such as volunteering or running for office.

c. requiring people to vote does not necessarily lead to election outcomes that better represent the preferences of the country as a whole.

d. countries that require voting must also make the process of voting easier for their citizens.

Explanation:

Text 1 中 Fowler 认为强制投票能让选举结果更好反映国家整体偏好。Text 2 中 Singh 和 Roy 指出强制投票时，选民可能少花时间了解投票选择，其投票可能不反映真实偏好。这意味着强制投票不一定让选举结果更好代表国家整体偏好，与 C 选项相符。A 选项人口规模文中未提；B 选项政治参与其他方式未涉及；D 选项投票流程难易度未讨论。

Answer:

C. Requiring people to vote does not necessarily lead to election outcomes that better represent the preferences of the country as a whole.