Question

review the third paragraph.transportation. in fact, participants in some cities report that they substitute rides via bike shares for car trips as much as twenty percent of the time.3 bike shares are advantageous not only for daily commuters but also for visitors whod like to tour a city. indeed, riding a bike is probably the best way to see any city. there is no better way of experiencing a citys sights and neighborhoods. \and nothing beats the experience of riding up and down the national mall on a bike,\ says andy clarke, president of the league of american bicyclists based in washington, d.c. many like clarke view bike - share programs as tourist attractions in themselves.4 bike sharing is also good exercise. a 2015 study conducted in minneapolisthe third paragraph is meant to support the authors main claim that bike - sharing programs are beneficial to people who live in urban areas. whats wrong with the authors argument in the third paragraph?the author does not supply enough evidence to support the claim that riding a bike is the best way to see a city.the author does not explain why bike - share programs would be relevant to tourists.the author does not address how weather conditions might affect the popularity of bike sharing.

Explanation:

The author claims that riding a bike is the best way to see a city but only provides an opinion from Andy Clarke. There is no data, comparison with other modes of transportation (like walking, taking a tour bus), or a broader survey of people's experiences to back up this claim. Just one person's view is not sufficient evidence for such a broad - reaching statement.

Answer:

The author does not supply enough evidence to support the claim that riding a bike is the best way to see a city.