Question

read the scenario. a state passes a law allowing businesses to refuse service to certain customers based on personal beliefs. however, the national government enforces a law that prohibits discrimination in public businesses. what is the best course of action to maintain balance and fairness? the national government must immediately repeal the state law. the state law will override the national law, allowing businesses to refuse service. the supreme court must review if the state law violates the us constitution. the governor will negotiate with the president to find a compromise.

Explanation:

This question is about the conflict between state law and national law in the US, and the role of the Supreme Court in reviewing constitutional violations. The option "The Supreme Court must review if the state law violates the US Constitution" is correct because the Supreme Court has the power of judicial review to determine if laws (state or federal) are constitutional. The national government doesn't immediately repeal state laws, state law can't override national law (supremacy clause), and governors/presidents negotiating isn't the primary way to resolve constitutional law conflicts.

Answer:

The Supreme Court must review if the state law violates the US Constitution