Sovi.AI - AI Math Tutor

Scan to solve math questions

QUESTION IMAGE

read the passage from sugar changed the world. no one could have seen i…

Question

read the passage from sugar changed the world.
no one could have seen it at the time, but the invention of beet sugar was not just a challenge to cane. it was a hint - just a glimpse, like a twist that comes about two thirds of the way through a movie - that the end of the age of sugar was in sight. for beet sugar showed that in order to create that perfect sweetness you did not need slaves, you did not need plantations, in fact you did not even need cane. beet sugar was a foreshadowing of what we have today: the age of science, in which sweetness is a product of chemistry, not whips.
in 1854 only 11 percent of world sugar production came from beets. by 1899 the percentage had risen to about 65 percent. and beet sugar was just the first challenge to cane. by 1879 chemists discovered saccharine - a laboratory - created substance that is several hundred times sweeter than natural sugar. today the sweeteners
which sentence best states the authors claim in the passage?
today we have many sources of sugar, but sugarcane is still the best source.
advances in the production of sweeteners hastened the end of involuntary servitude.
the age of science has made the role of modern chemists similar to the former role of slaves.
brazilians make ethanol from sugarcane because they cannot grow corn successfully.

Explanation:

Brief Explanations

The passage discusses how beet sugar (a sweetener) was a sign that the Age of Sugar (which relied on slavery, plantations, and cane) was ending. It shows that advancements in sweetener production (like beet sugar and later saccharine) were part of the move away from the old - sugar production model that involved involuntary servitude. The other options are incorrect:

  • The first option about sugarcane being the best source is not the main claim as the passage is about the end of an era related to sugar production methods (not which source is best).
  • The third option about chemists and slaves is a misinterpretation. The passage says sweetness is a product of chemistry (not whips/slavery), not that chemists' role is like slaves.
  • The fourth option about Brazilians and corn is a detail not related to the main claim about the end of involuntary servitude in the sugar context.

Answer:

Advances in the production of sweeteners hastened the end of involuntary servitude.