Question

question 8 (1 point) ✓ saved kant argues that an action done out of love or compassion is fully autonomous, whereas an action done strictly from duty is not. true false question 9 (1 point) ✓ saved when treating others, kant emphasizes that we should never treat people as means to ends, to any degree at all, even when paying someone for a service. true false question 10 (1 point) ✓ saved kant suggests that the duty to not mistreat animals is derived from the fact that animals possess dignity and rationality, which grants them rights. true false

Explanation:

• Question 8: Kant's moral philosophy emphasizes that actions from duty (acting in accordance with the moral law) are autonomous. Actions from love or compassion are based on inclination, not the pure moral will (autonomy).
• Question 9: Kant's formula of humanity says we should treat humanity (in ourselves and others) as an end, not merely as a means. But when paying for a service, we are using someone as a means (they provide a service for payment), but not merely as a means (they consent, and we respect their personhood).
• Question 10: Kant believed animals don't have rationality (a key for moral status in his view). The duty not to mistreat animals is because mistreating them can lead to mistreating humans (indirect duty), not because animals have dignity/rationality.

Answer:

• Question 8: False
• Question 9: False
• Question 10: False