Question

question 33 (2 points)
listen
a criticism of the cosmological argument mentioned in the text is
a) it seems possible that there could be an infinite series of causes.
b) the uncaused cause of the universe could be matter or energy.
c) it makes no sense to say the existence of something is necessary.
d) all of the choices are correct
question 34 (2 points)
listen
in his refutation of the teleological argument, david hume argues that
a) the analogy between human creations and the universe is weak.
b) we have no other universe with which to compare this one.
c) it supports the conclusion that god has all the limitations of human creators.
d) all of the choices are correct

Explanation:

For Question 33: Common criticisms of the cosmological argument include challenging the rejection of an infinite causal series (A), proposing non-divine uncaused causes like matter/energy (B), and questioning the coherence of necessary existence (C). Thus all options are valid criticisms.
For Question 34: Hume’s refutation of the teleological argument attacks its core analogy (A), notes the lack of comparative universes to validate design claims (B), and argues the analogy implies God has human-like limitations (C). All options reflect his arguments.

Answer:

D) all of the choices are correct
D) all of the choices are correct