Question

question 10 of 25
a scientist makes a claim that a certain treatment prevents diabetes.
however, other scientists repeat the experiment and get different
results. what should happen next?

a. the treatment should be used until a better treatment can
be found.

b. the scientists should look for other ways to use the
treatment.

c. the claim should be questioned until more evidence is
available.

d. the scientist should republish the data that support the
claim.

Explanation:

In scientific research, when experimental results are inconsistent, claims should be questioned and further evidence sought. Option A is incorrect as using an unproven treatment is not scientific. Option B shifts focus from validating the claim. Option D of republishing supporting data ignores conflicting results. Only option C follows scientific method by questioning the claim until more evidence clarifies.

Answer:

C. The claim should be questioned until more evidence is available.