Question

q18. use the information to answer the question.
part a
the scientists in location a and location b claim that at one time, these digs were very close together.
explain whether the scientists’ claim is valid. use evidence from the information about the digs and from figure 1 to support your explanation.
0 / 1000 word limit

Explanation:

To determine the validity of the scientists' claim, we would analyze the geological evidence from the digs (e.g., matching rock layers, fossil assemblages) and Figure 1 (likely showing plate movement, continental drift, or geological structures). If the digs have similar rock sequences, fossils, or geological features, and Figure 1 supports continental drift (e.g., plate tectonics showing the regions were once adjacent), the claim is valid. For example, if Location A and B have identical fossil layers and Figure 1 shows they were part of the same landmass (like Pangaea), the claim holds.

Answer:

The scientists' claim is valid if the digs at Location A and B show matching geological evidence (e.g., identical rock layers, fossils) and Figure 1 (e.g., plate tectonic models) supports their former proximity (e.g., continental drift evidence). For instance, similar fossil assemblages and rock strata, combined with a plate - movement diagram showing the regions were once part of the same landmass, confirm the claim.