QUESTION IMAGE
Question
the proof that \\( \triangle rst \cong \triangle vst \\) is shown.
given: \\( \overline { st } \\) is the perpendicular bisector of \\( \overline { rv } \\).
prove: \\( \triangle rst \cong \triangle vst \\)
what is the missing reason in the proof?
| statements | reasons |
|---|---|
| 2. \\( \angle str \\) and \\( \angle stv \\) are right angles. | 2. def. of perpendicular bisector |
| 3. \\( \overline { rs } \cong \overline { vs } \\) | 3. ? |
| 4. \\( \overline { st } \cong \overline { st } \\) | 4. reflexive property |
| 5. \\( \triangle rst \cong \triangle vst \\) | 5. hl theorem |
perpendicular bisector theorem
converse of the perpendicular bisector theorem
pythagorean theorem
sss congruence theorem
The perpendicular bisector theorem states that if a point is on the perpendicular bisector of a segment, then it is equidistant from the endpoints of the segment. Here, since \(ST\) is the perpendicular bisector of \(RV\) and \(S\) is a point on \(ST\), by the perpendicular bisector theorem, \(RS\cong VS\).
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
perpendicular bisector theorem